June 27: Small Businesses Respond to High Court's Divided Ruling Monday on Public Financing Laws

MSA leaders say decision striking trigger provisions allows corporate players to buy political influence uncontested, at expense of small businesses

Download PDF of this release

WASHINGTON, DC – On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in McComish v. Bennett, a case testing some state public financing laws. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled narrowly that trigger-based matching funds provisions of some states' public financing laws are unconstitutional, while leaving the foundation of public financing systems intact.

The Main Street Alliance released the following statements from national spokespeople in response:

Jim Houser, owner of Hawthorne Auto Clinic in Portland, OR and MSA steering committee member:

This decision is bad for small businesses. We don't have the kind of money it takes to buy influence through heavy election spending the way big corporate players can. The Court's decision basically says to big corporations and their trade groups, 'Go ahead, spend all you want to buy elections, and if anyone tries to limit the corrupting influence of your activities, we'll run interference for you.

The silver lining is that the decision leaves the basic structure of public financing systems intact, reaffirming that small dollar public financing laws are a legitimate way to combat corruption and promote free speech. Establishing small dollar fair elections laws is a critical way to take corporate corruption out of elections and restore integrity to our political system.

David Borris, owner of Hel’s Kitchen Catering in Northbrook, IL and MSA executive committee member:

This decision goes against the very idea of America as the 'land of opportunity.' It means big spenders, many of which are big businesses, will be able spend massive sums of money to flood election debates and drown out the interests of small businesses like mine. It means corporate heavy hitters will continue to be able to buy influence by tipping the scales of elections with their campaign spending, then rewrite the laws of the land to favor their narrow special interests at the expense of small businesses - and everyone else.

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Join us!


get updates